Lalan Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3134 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHRA District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Lalan Sah Son of Nageshwar Sah, resident of village- Lalganj, P.S. Bihra, District- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 341, 324, 307, 326 (A) and 498 A of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner being the husband of the informant after sprinkling kerosene oil on her body burnt her and thereafter she was brought by the father-in-law and mother-in-law at the Sadar Hospital, Saharsa for treatment and thereafter to Gayatri Nursing Home.
Submission is of false implication and that the wife of the petitioner received burn injury at the time of cooking, the petitioner is ready to keep her with full dignity and honour, charge
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3134 of 2016 (4) dt.22-04-2016 2/2 sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 01.06.2015 and as such now he deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that 70% burn injuries have been found on the person of the informant.
In the facts and circumstances as stated above, at this stage I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 109 of 2015 pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa.
However, considering detention of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking the same on the priority basis, failing which the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail, if at no fault. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T