← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2416/2022allowed

Arbind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-13Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2416 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2020 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Arbind Yadav Son Of Nanbut Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav R/O VillageSerthua Tola Bazar, P.S.- Makhdumpur (TEHTA O.P.), District- Jehanabad 2.

Upendra Yadav @ Tikar Yadav Son Of Late Somar Yadav R/O VillageSerthua Tola Bazar, P.S.- Makhdumpur (TEHTA O.P.), District- Jehanabad 3.

Nanbut Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav Son Of Late Somar Yadav R/O VillageSerthua Tola Bazar, P.S.- Makhdumpur (TEHTA O.P.), District- Jehanabad 4.

Mallu Yadav @ Pavindra Kumar Son Of Nanbut Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav R/O Village- Serthua Tola Bazar, P.S.- Makhdumpur (TEHTA O.P.), DistrictJehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault upon the informant by the accused persons along with these petitioners. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2416 of 2022(2) dt.13-06-2022 2/2 parties and both parties have separate injuries as alleged in the FIR and no specific allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur (Tehta) P.S. Case No. 146 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T