Prabhat Singh @ Prabhat Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6652 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2024 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Prabhat Singh @ Prabhat Kumar Singh Son of Late Sudama Singh Resident of village- Semarbari PS -Phulwariya District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Suman Kumari Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner, with the help of spade, assaulted on head of son of informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, the present case is counter-blast of Phulwariya P.S. Case No. 130 of 2024 which was lodged by co-accused Pahwari Singh against informant and others and only with the view to save their skin from the aforesaid case, this false and concocted case has been lodged.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6652 of 2025(2) dt.03-03-2025 2/2 Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific and direct accusation that he assaulted on head of son of informant by means of spade. It is further submitted that doctor has found the injuries sustained by the injured to be grievous in nature.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T