Satya Prakash Bihari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17385 of 2008 ======================================================
1. Satya Prakash Bihari, aged about 45 years, son of Late Rash Bihari Prasad, Resident of Mohalla - Arya Nagar, Kataharibagh, P.S. - Chapra (Town), P.O. - Chapra, District - Saran, presently residing at Roshan Ghat, Khan Mirza, P.S. - Sultanganj, P.O.- Mahendru, District - Patna - 800006.
2. Triloki Prasad Yadav, aged about 43 years, son of Late Kripalu Prasad Yadav, Resident of Mohalla - Pathri Ghat, Gulzarbagh, District - Patna - 800007.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
3. The Home Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
4. The Finance Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
5. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Personnel Administrative of Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
6. The Director, the Directorate of Prosecution, Government of Bihar, Riding Road, Patna.
7. The High Court of Judicature at Patna through its Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna.
8. The Bihar Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Baily Road, Patna.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to SC - 15 Mr. Satyabir Bharti Mr. Zaki Haider ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4.
10-03-2017 Sri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, in presence of learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 15, Sri Satyabir Bharti, learned counsel for respondent/High Court as well as Mr. Zaki Haider, learned counsel for Bihar Public Service Commission, submits that in
Patna High Court CWJC No.17385 of 2008 (4) dt.10-03-2017 2/2 view of changed circumstances, presently he is intending not to press the petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U