← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13341/2008dfd for non appearance

Nilam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-02Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13341 of 2008 ====================================================== Nilam Kumari daughter of Mahendra Sah, wife of Ashok Kumar Gupta, resident of village Manasi Chapra, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

2. The Director, Department of Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

3. The Director, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, East Champaran

5. The Block Development Officer, Kalyanpur, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran

6. The District Education Officer, East Champaran

7. The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran

8. The Block Education Extension Officer Kalyanpur, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran

9. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Bhuwan Chapra, Block Kalyanpur, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran

10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhuwan Chapra, Block Kalyanpur, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran

11. The Principal, Government Primary School Chapra Vishwanath Block Kalyanpur, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. (GA1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-01-2018 By order dated 14.11.2011, the present writ application was to be listed after disposal of L.P.A. No.855 of 2011. The office has pointed out that L.P.A. No.855 of 2011 has been disposed of on 30.11.2012.

On the last date i.e. on 07.12.2017, none had appeared on

Patna High Court CWJC No.13341 of 2008(4) dt.02-01-2018 2/2 behalf of the petitioner. Today also, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.

The writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U