← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/948/2024dismissed

Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-22Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy,The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.948 of 2024 ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar S/o Ram Balak Yadav, resident of At-Sinduari, P.O. and P.S.- Konch, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Anchal Gaya, District-Gaya.

5.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division-Tekari, District-Gaya.

6.

The Junior Engineer, Rural Works Department, Tekari, District-Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rama Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Thakur, AC to GA-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 22-01-2024 The petitioner is aggrieved with the Annexure-P/1 which has blacklisted him in accordance with Clause-14 of the Agreement.

We see that the agreement is said to have been produced as is seen from the memorandum by Annexure-P/3. However, only the first page has been produced and even the page with Clause-14 has not been produced.

Patna High Court CWJC No.948 of 2024(2) dt.22-01-2024 2/2 In such circumstance, we see that the writ petition itself to be not maintainable and we dismiss the same. However, leaving liberty to the petitioner to file a proper writ petition. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/Kiran U