Nirmla Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.95 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9899 of 2016 ====================================================== Nirmla Kumari wife of Shrilal Mandal, resident of village- Kariho, P.S. + District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely, Shri Amrit Lal Meena.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely, Sri Vijay Kumar Verma 3.

The Secretary, Integrated Child Development Schemes, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely, Sri Vijay Kumar Verma 4.

The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa, namely, Shri Dinesh Kumar. 5.

The District Magistrate, Supaul, namely, Shri Kaushal Kumar. 6.

The Collector, Supaul, namely, Shri Kaushal Kumar. 7.

The District Programme Officer, ICDS, Supaul, namely, Smt. Shobha Sinha, District- supaul 8.

Asha Devi wife of Shri Girish Kumar Paswan resident of village- Kariho, Ward No.6, P.S. and District- Supaul.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Government Advocate 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party No.8 and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the State has filed a supplementary show cause stating therein that the order of this Court has already been complied with and the order, which was passed contrary to the order of this Court, has been recalled by

Patna High Court MJC No.95 of 2025(6) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 the Divisional Commissioner by order dated 10.04.2026 and the petitioner has been reinstated on the post in question and he has also directed to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioner but the arrears of salary of the petitioner has not been paid to her.

3. Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the authority concerned for release of her arrears of salary.

4. In view of the aforesaid, this contempt application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U