Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12403/2021bail granted

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2021-09-22Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12403 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-547 Year-2019 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Mahto S/O Bisheshwar Patel R/O Village Nari Khurad, P.S. Tisauta, District Vaishali ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.LK Sharma, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was refused by this Court vide order dated 9.7.2020 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 18752/2020.

From perusal of the trial court's report dated 12.8.2021 it appears that charge has already been framed on 2.7.2021 and the matter is pending for prosecution evidence. Petitioner is in custody since 10.1.2020.

Considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner and progress of the trial, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate XIV,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 12403 of 2021(4) dt.22-09-2021 2/2 Saran at Chapra in Gorkha Police Station Case No. 546 of 2019 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T