← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2908/2025bail granted

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-24Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2908 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-384 Year-2024 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Ray Son of Ratan Ray Resident of Motipur, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur 2.

Dharmendra Kumar Son of Late Rajkumar Poddar Resident of VillKamalpur, Ward No.- 2, P.S.- Jalalgarh, District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Meena Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 384 of 2024 dated 06.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 419.04 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the Pick-up vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioners was transpired in this case merely on suspicion. The petitioners are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2908 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/2 the driver and the khalasi of the said vehicle but they have no knowledge about the aforesaid seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 06.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Araria in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 384 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T