← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1547/2019dismissed

Gaya Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-28Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1547 of 2019 ====================================================== Gaya Sharma son of Charitra Sharma R/o- Village Rampur Charui, P.s. Jehananbad, Dist- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar though the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, government of Bihar

3. The Collector Jehanabad

4. The District Land Acquisition Officer Jehanabad

5. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director Bihar State Pool Nirman Nigam Limited, Mangles Road,Patna

6. The Circle Officer Modanganj Block, District- Jehanabad ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Ojha For the Respondent State:

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC-25) For the Respondent No.5 :

Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Mr. Bipin Kumar @ Deo, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner claims that his land was acquired in 2011 for the purpose of construction of approach road to a bridge and the bridge.

On perusal of the pleadings on record, I find that it is the petitioner's case that for payment of compensation he approached the authorities in 2011. Nearly eight years thereafter this application has been filed. There is absolutely no explanation in the writ application to justify the delay of eight years in approaching this Court. It is surprising to note that the petitioner has taken a plea that the said land has been acquired

Patna High Court CWJC No.1547 of 2019(2) dt.28-01-2019 2/2 without completing the land acquisition proceeding. It is difficult to accept such contention raised eight years after the construction.

This application has no merit, rather appears to be frivolous and is accordingly dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U