Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2969/2026dismissed

Shankar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2969 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2025 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Shankar Kumar Son of Mukesh Kumar Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Resident of village-Navadih P.S- Jadia Dist- Supaul 2.

Ravindra Kumar Son of Ram Prasad Pandit Resident of village-Navadih P.SJadia Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Jadia P.S. Case No. 201/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(6) of B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown criminals are alleged to have snatched Rs. 30,000/- and other articles from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. The name of the petitioners has come during investigation. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2969 of 2026(4) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 and petitioner no. 2 has clean antecedent and they are in custody since 30.09.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners on the ground that the motorcycle using which the crime was committed has been recovered from petitioner no. 2 and so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, his name has come in the self-inculpatory statement of the co-accused.

6. Considering the criminal antecedent and the allegation levelled against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed and if the prosecution delays the trial, the petitioners may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T