Patna High CourtCWJC/13690/2018disposed

Anuj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-06Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13690 of 2018 ====================================================== Anuj Kumar Singh, Son of Late Siya Sharan Singh at Present residing at Rajiv Nagar, Road No. 16 P.S.-Rajiv Nagar, District-Patna at Present Working as Junior Engineer Rural Work Department Work Division Balia, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Rural Work Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Work Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Depty Secretary, Rural Work Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Engineer in Chief, Rural Work Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Chief Engineer Work Department, Bishwashraiya Bhawan, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Superintending Engineer Rural Work Department, Samastipur,

7. The Executive Engineer Rural Work Department, Balia, Begusarai

8. The Bihar Public service Commission, Bihar, Patna through its Chairman

9. The Chairman Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, AC to AAG6 For the BPSC : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

The petitioner is holding the post of Junior Engineer and has made a prayer for his promotion to the rank of Assistant Engineer though his junior has been granted the benefit of promotion but, without any rhyme or reason, he has been deprived of the same.

The petitioner has filed several representations for consideration but, the respondents has callously refused to

Patna High Court CWJC No.13690 of 2018 dt.06-09-2018 2/2 consider the case of the petitioner and failed to take a substantive decision.

Let the respondents should consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforementioned observation and direction, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.09.2018 Transmission Date NA