Prabhakar Singh @ Lalla Thakur @ Lala Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4751 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2024 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Prabhakar Singh @ Lalla Thakur @ Lala Thakur S/O Ram Khelawar Singh @ Ram Kalebar Singh R/O Village- Narar Uttawari Tol, P.S- Kaluahi, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413 & 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Sections 8(c), 21(b), 21(c) & 22(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act and under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26/35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of this petitioner, one loaded pistol and 50 gm of brown sugar was recovered and from co-accused 49 gm of brown sugar was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4751 of 2026(2) dt.02-02-2026 2/2 submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police has not complied Section 105 of the BNSS. It has further been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovered of alleged contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less than the commercial quantity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has lastly submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 01.04.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with G.R. No. 20 of 2024, arising out of Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 99 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-V, Madhubani.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T