Rajeev Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2956 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-765 Year-2017 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar Yadav, S/o Rajendra Yadav, Resident of Village-Manikpur Ward No. 10, Police Station-Simraha, District-Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Juhi Kumari D/o Ranbir Yadav, Wife of Rajeev Kumar Yadav, Resident of village-Rampur north Ward No 10, Police Station-Forbesganj, DistrictAraria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No.765-C of 2017, disclosing offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Case is under Section 498-A of IPC with an allegation of demand and torture.

On appearance of the opposite party no. 2, the matter was referred to the District Mediation Center, Araria, vide order dated 16.04.2019. The report of Mediator is available on record at Flag "M" which disclosed that the mediation has been leading to restoration of matrimonial relationship between the parties and detail report is also annexed, whcih disclosed that they are residing together.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2956 of 2019(5) dt.19-07-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 have admitted the above facts. Having heard both sides, considering the above facts and circumstances, as stated above, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 23.01.2019 is confirmed with the condition that both the parties will abide by the terms of agreement agreed upon them.

Let a copy of Mediator's report along with terms of agreement be sent to the court concerned for needful. With the aforesaid observations, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T