Jay Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2184 of 2025 ====================================================== Jay Ram Singh Son of Rajendra Mandal Resident of Village- Bathnaha, P.O.- Bhataura, P.S.- Khanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Addl. Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The State Health Society, through its Chief Executive Officer, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Civil Surgeon-Cum- Chief Medical Officer, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raja Ram Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent No. 2:

Mr.K.K. Sinha, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.P.K.Shahi, AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondent no. 9 and learned counsel for the State.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel that vide Annexure 'P/1' the petitioner has been appointed on the post of Driver in the year of 2014 as daily wage employee. He has completed more than 10 years in his service, therefore, in light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others vs. Umadevi and others ( Appeal (civil) 3595-3612 of 1999), he is entitled to get regularization of his services for which he already made his representation before the respondent-authority vide Annexure 'P/3' but no decision has been taken by the concerned

Patna High Court CWJC No.2184 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 respondent, therefore, it is prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner that this petition may be disposed of directing the concerned respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner in light of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Umadevi (supra) and other relevant rules and laws.

3. The above prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the State.

4. Considering the submission made by both the parties, this petition is disposed of and respondent no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure 'P/3') in accordance with relevant rules and laws and further taking into consideration the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Umadevi (supra) and the decision will be taken within 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Arvind Singh Chandel , J) tusharika/- U