Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1005 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Dhiraj Kumar S/o- Ramjanam Thakur R/v- Ganga Sirisiya Ps- Chakia DistEast Champaran 2.

Aanjali Devi @ Anjali Kumari W/o- Sonu Kumar R/v- Ganga Sirisiya PsChakia Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Addl. Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 74, 118(1), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners along with other accused persons assaulted informant and her daughter with knife due to which they sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched gold jewellery from the neck of informant and her daughter and took Rs. 20,000/- from the house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1005 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 parties are agnates and due to land dispute, altercation took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Present case is counter blast of Chakia P. S. Case No. 331 of 2025 registered against informant and others. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, injuries, case and counter case and clean antecedents, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-I, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chakia P. S. Case No. 321 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T