← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7170/2008disposed

Manoj Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-19Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7170 of 2008 ======================================================

1. Manoj Kumar, son of Late Lal Singh, Resident of Mohalla Khaghadia Patti, P.O. Takia, Police Station Sasaram, District - Rohtas.

2. Sukhari Baitha son of Late Dasarath Baitha, Resident of Village Karkatpur, P.O. and P.S. Akorhi Gola, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Superintending Engineer, Bhojpur Circle, Road Construction Department, Ara.

4. Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Dehri-on-Sone Division, Dehri-On-Sone.

5. Sub-Divisional Officer (Road) Sub-Division Bikramganj, DistrictRohtas.

6. Sub-Divisional Officer (Road) Sub-Division Dehri-On-Sone, District Rohtas.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarva Deo Singh Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General - 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

19-03-2015 After some argument, learned counsel for petitioners, in presence of learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General - 5, makes a prayer for disposal of the writ petition with an indication that the respondent no. 4, before whom the petitioner has filed representation vide Annexure '6', may consider the representation and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of with an

Patna High Court CWJC No.7170 of 2008 (2) dt.19-03-2015 2/2 observation that Respondent No. 4, the Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department may consider the representation of these two petitioners i.e. Annexure 6 & 7 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U