Sanjeet Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3364 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2015 Thana -AHIAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Sanjeet Sah Son of late Nathu Sah, Resident of Village- Mustafapur, P.S. Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 447, 323, 326, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, in the occurrence, the petitioner poured acid on the informant causing burn injury and further, the mother of the informant also received acid burn injury. Submission is of false implication due to land dispute, two co-accused Amod Sah and Pramod Sah have already been allowed regular bail whereas Poonam Devi has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3364 of 2016 (4) dt.16-03-2016 2/2 allowed pre-arrest bail. The informant was treated in private hospital and not in government hospital, and as such, the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 05.08.2015, deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned APP seriously opposes by submitting that serious burn injuries have been found on the person of the informant.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the land dispute, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail after completion of nine months custody from the date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) ajaypd./- U T