Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3350 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHNAR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Kunal Kumar S/o Sri Anil Kumar Singh, R/o Village - Rampur Baghel, P.S. - Deshri (Sahdei O.P.), District - Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.Ehteshmuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahanar P.S. Case No. 156 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 326, 307/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is submitted that the petitioner gave confessional statement in Jandaha P.S.Case No. 143 of 2015 stating his involvement in this crime also and accordingly, he has been remanded in this case and he is suffering in custody since 17.09.2015 but he has not been put on T.I.P, no tangible and legal material has come against the petitioner besides the confessional statement of co-accused and the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3350 of 2016 (3) dt.16-03-2016 2/2 Learned APP, after going through the case diary, fairly submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent and besides the confessional statement, there is no other tangible material against the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VIth, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahanar P.S. Case No. 156 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) ajaypd./- U T