Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2052 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-579 Year-2021 Thana- BEUR District- Patna ====================================================== SONU KUMAR S/O SANJAY PRASAD @ DHANANJAY PRASAD Resident of village- Ghataro, P.S.- Kartara, District- Vaishali, at present Gardanibagh,Road No.-1, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kaushal Kishor For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 406, 419, 420, 414, 468, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner and others is of cheating and withdrawal of money on the basis of Cyber crime likewise Phone Pay, Gpay and other Apps, they used to transfer money in their accounts from the accounts of different persons in the name of providing them loan.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. There is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2052 of 2023(3) dt.15-05-2023 2/2 specific overt act against the petitioner in respect of alleged incident. He submitted that the specific allegation is against coaccused Raushan Kumar and on his confessional statement the name of the petitioner come into light. No incriminating article has recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 30.12.2021.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Patna in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 579 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T