Patna High CourtC. REV./495/2017dismissed

Rajeev Ranjan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-21The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.495 of 2017 IN Letters Patent Appeal No. 1478 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Rajeev Ranjan Son of Doma Choudhary Resident of Boudh Vihar Colony, P.S. Agamkuan, District Patna.

2. Prabhat Sharan Mandal Son of Ram Sharan Mandal resident of near Brigh Career School ,Purnea Shakti Nagar, Bhatta Bazar, Purnea.

3. Satish Kumar Son of Sundar Lal Rajak Resident of Village- Dangra Ahar, P.S. Arwal, District Arwal.

.... .... Appellants/Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna through its Secretary,

5. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

6. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

7. The Inspector General of Police, Economic Offence Unit, Patna.

8. The Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Bihar, Patna.

9. Ravi Ranjan S/o Sudha Singh, resident of village Bandhubigha, PS Kinger, Distt. Arwal

10. Manoranjan Kumar S/o Naresh Singh, r/o Bansipur, PS Karja, Distt. Lakhisarai .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Varma For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 21-02-2018 Delay in filing of the application is condoned. I A No. 675 of 2018 stands allowed and disposed of.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties we see no error in the order passed by this Court warranting reconsideration.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.495 of 2017 dt.21-02-2018 2/2 However, after the orders passed by this Court in the writ petition, if any subsequent developments have taken place which has the result of giving fresh cause to the applicants, the applicants shall have the liberty to challenge it afresh in accordance with law as may be permissible.

With the aforesaid, this Civil Review application stands dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) mrl./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date24/02/2018 Transmission Date