Amrendra Kumar v. The Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.735 of 2024 ====================================================== Amrendra Kumar S/o Moti Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Old Kankarbag, Gate No.-15.5, Kankarbag, P.S.- Patrakarnagar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University, Patna. 2.

The Registrar, Patliputra University Patna.

3.

The Professor-in-charge, S.K.M.V. College, Fatuha, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rana Vikram Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The petitioner has moved this Court for the following reliefs:- (i) For issuance of writ for quashing the Memo No.INS/PPU11?2023 dated 09.11.2023, by which one Ram Naresh Das has been inducted as donor member of the Governing Body of Sant Kabir Mahanth Vidyanand Mahavidyalay, Fatuha, Patna (hereinafter S.K.M.V. College), since inception donor member has been illegally inducted as member of the Governing Body, who has never donated anything to the College either in mode of cash or in mode of land, so any induction and inclusion in Governing Body illegal per se which is not at all valid in the eye of law. (ii) For issuance of writ commanding and directing the respondent to constitute a Governing Body following the conditions laid down in Section 60 of Bihar University Act,

Patna High Court CWJC No.735 of 2024(2) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 1976 read with statute 32, as per prevailing law donorship is not inherited.

(iii) For issuance of any other writ, order, direction for this the writ petitioner shall be found entitled under the fact and circumstances of the case.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation before the respondent no.2 (Annexure-P/6) but till date the representation of the petitioner has not been disposed of by the respondent no.2. 4.

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter. 5.

It is made clear that respondent no.2 shall be liable for noncompliance of this order within the stipulated period. 6.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U