Ram Uchit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13514 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2020 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

RAM UCHIT YADAV Son of Rambali Yadav Resident of VillageKayampur, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda. 2.

Rambali Yadav Son of Late Shital Yadav Resident of Village- Kayampur, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

3.

Ram Bhajan Yadav Son of Rambali Yadav Resident of Village- Kayampur, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Rahui P.S. Case No. 89 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the accused persons having armed came at the door of informant and started abusing the informant. On protest, the accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members as a result of which, the informant and his family members sustained injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13514 of 2021(2) dt.24-02-2022 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place between the parties. The injury on the side of the accused has not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 89 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T