Manish Kumar @ Tekal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6408 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -162 Year- 2014 Thana -PATNA CITY CHOWK District- PATNA ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Tekal son of Baban Prasad resident of village - Jajak Toli, P.S. Chowk, Distt. - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 20-02-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he entered into the house of the informant and while he was committing the theft, he was intercepted but he fled away and on his confessional statement Rs. 2,07,000/- has been recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that out of Rs. 2.10,000/-, Rs. 2,07,000/- has already been recovered. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. There is no chance of tampering with the witnesses.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6408 of 2015 (2) dt.20-02-2015 2/2 each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Patna City in Chowk P. S. case no. 162 of 2014 after framing of charge with the following conditions :

1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) sudip/- U T