Harendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9200 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-442 Year-2018 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna ====================================================== Harendra Kumar, Gender- Male, aged about 20 years, Son of Bhuneshwar Chaudhary, Resident of Purana Kothi, P.S.- Kaler District.-Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has stated that while he was in Mahabir Mandir, petitioner diced his mobile from pocket and started fleeing away and was apprehended after being chased and was handed over to the police.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and he has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2018.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9200 of 2019(2) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 442 of 2018 (G.R. No. 4550 of 2018), subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T