Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2232/2026bail granted

Rohit Dubey v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-21Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2232 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2025 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== Rohit Dubey Son of Bhrigunath Dubey Resident of Vill. - Darauli, P.S. -Darauli, Dist. - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Sharda Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 291 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 317(2), 338, 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-B)(A) 26 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that in course of vehicle checking a motorcycle was seized, but petitioner failed to produce any paper regarding ownership of the said motorcycle. On search, a country made pistol along with three live cartridge were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2232 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 291 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T