Jai Pukar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2784 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2021 Thana- ARWAL District- Jehanabad ====================================================== JAI PUKAR RAI S/o Chand Govind Rai R/o village- Bahoranpur, P.S.- Sahpur, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-06-2022 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021 lodged under Sections 468/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 25(1aa)/26/35 of Arms Act. There is recovery of two rifle, one pistol and life cartridges form possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 09.07.2021 i.e. about 12 months. On the point of criminal incident, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready to furnish an undertaking before the court that he shall never involve in such types of activities in future.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2784 of 2022(2) dt.08-06-2022 2/2 Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of the case and after perusal of records as well as this aspect that charge sheet has already been filed in this case and petitioner is in custody about 12 months, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021.

On the point of criminal incident, petitioner is also directed to file an affidavit that he shall not involve in such types of activity in future before trial court at the time of furnishing his bail-bond.

The prosecution is at liberty to file cancellation of bail, in case the petitioner violates his undertaking. (Dr. Anshuman, J) ravishankar/- U T