Raj Kumar Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar, Through Director General Of Police, Department Of Home, Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.229 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2016 Thana- BIHRA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Raj Kumar Mukhiya, Son of Late Kusheshwar Mukhiya, Resident of VillageSihaul, Tola Chakla, Police Station- Bihra, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, Through Director General Of Police, Department Of Home, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Deputy Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa.

5.

The Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail, Saharsa. 6.

The Registrar, Civil Court, Saharsa.

7.

Pawan Kamat, Son of Binda Kamat, 8.

Bhagwan Jhar, Son of Hirdeshwar Jha, 9.

Raghaw Kunwar, Son of Bhawadit Kunwar.

10.

Anil Kumar Jha, Son of Kulanand Jha.

11.

Mithilesh Kamat, Son of Babu Lal Kamat.

12.

Mithilesh Jha, son of Sheo Shankar Jha.

13.

Arbind Kumar Singh, Son of Late Maheshwar Singh. 14.

Rajesh Kunwar, Son of Late Lalan Kunwar, 15.

Surendra Mukhiya, Son of Tirthi Mukhiya, 16.

Tirthi Mukhiya, Son of Late Bangat Mukhiya.

17.

Baidya Nath Sah, Son of Rajendra Sah.

18.

Rajaram Mukhiya, Son of Sheo Narayan Mukhiya. 19.

Bamshankar Mukhiya, Son of Sheo Narayan Mukhiya. 20.

Bhushan Mukhiya, Son of Sheo Narayan Mukhiya. 21.

Ranjit Mukhiya, Son of Late Bijay Mukhiya, 7 to 21 Residents of VillageSihaul, Police Station- Bihra, District- Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025 After some arguments, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.229 of 2018(2) dt.22-08-2025 2/2 petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move appropriate application before the Court concerned.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty as sought for. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T