← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/826/2024disposed

Md. Niyaz Iqbal @ Niyaz Iqbal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-11Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.826 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Niyaz Iqbal @ Niyaz Iqbal S/o Late Md. Ramjani Miyan @ Ramjani Miyan, Resident of -Danka Imli, P.S.-Alamganj, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary Road Construction Department Nirman Bhawan, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Engineer in Chief cum Additional Secretary, Joint Secretary, Road Construction Department Nirman Bhawan, Patna. 4.

The Chief Engineer, Ganga Bridge/Setu Prabandhan Upbhag Project Wing, Road Construction Department, Nirman Bhawan, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

6.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Patna City, Patna. 7.

The Deputy Chief Setu Specialist cum Executive Engineer, Setu Shodh Vikash Pramandal-02, Road Construction Department/Setu Prabandhan Upbhag, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Avinash, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Standing Counsel- 28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 11-11-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. That this application is being filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to complete the rehabilitation scheme, formulated on account of construction of Ganga Bridge, after removal of the encroachment in

Patna High Court CWJC No.826 of 2024(5) dt.11-11-2024 2/2 question and then register the said land in favour of the petitioner, which has been allotted to the petitioner.

1/B. For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the letter dated 16.05.2024, issued by the Respondent No. 4, whereby and whereunder he has cancelled the plot allotted to the petitioner, in pursuance to the rehabilitation scheme of Ganga Bridge Project."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondent No. 4 i.e. the Chief Engineer, Ganga Bridge/Setu Prabandhan Upbhag Project Wing, Road Construction Department, Nirman Bhawan, Patna for redressal of his aforesaid grievances, in light of the various orders of this Court, which he shall produce before the respondent no. 4. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U