Baliram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3176 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2018 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Baliram Yadav Ramchandra Yadav Resident of Village- Madhopur, Police Station- Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Aditya Dev, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Majhaulia P. S. Case No. 158 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498 (A) and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 34 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner, who happens to be the husband of the informant, is of subjecting with cruelty to his wife due to dowry demand. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has stated that informant is residing in his house and still he is ready to keep the informant and the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3176 of 2019(3) dt.21-02-2019 2/2 allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- ( Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Majhaulia P.S.Case No. 158 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, District- West Champaran, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T