Satyanarayan Ram @ Satya Narayan Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4055 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Satyanarayan Ram @ Satya Narayan Ray S/O Parmeshwar Ray @ Parmeshwar Ram Resident of village - Birpur, P.S- Basopatti, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 229 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from the possession of this petitioner, one country made pistol was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It has also been submitted that the police has not complied Section 105 of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4055 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 BNSS while making the seizure. The witnesses of seizure list are police personnel. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 24.09.2025. Learned counsel has further submitted that similarly situated other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 84239 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 229 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T