← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1394/2026bail granted

Tunni Devi @ Tuni Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1394 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2025 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

Tunni Devi @ Tuni Devi W/o Lakshman Mahto Resident of Village- Eksari, P.O.- Maninda, P.S.- Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura 2.

Lakshman Mahto S/o Punna Mahto Resident of Village- Eksari, P.O.- Maninda, P.S.- Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Roop Kishan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 1 is a woman and petitioner no. 2 is alleged to have assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that petitioners are aunt and uncle of the informant and are having dispute relating to property. It is further submitted that no doubt it is alleged that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1394 of 2026(2) dt.22-01-2026 2/2 petitioner no. 2 assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on head, but then blow was not repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple in nature and petitioners are not criminals.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 276 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T