← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2344/2017withdrawn

S. S. Briks v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-12-16The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2344 of 2017 ====================================================== S. S. Briks, Aurangabad, a proprietorship firm, having its office at VillageSanathua, P.O. Yogiya, P.S. Rishiyap, District Aurangabad through its Proprietor Shri Satyendra Narayan Singh, Resident of Village- Sanathua, P.O. Yogiya, P.S. Rishiyap, District Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Aurangabad Circle, Aurangabad 3.

The Commercial Tax Officer, Aurangabad Circle, Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyabir Bharti, Advocate Ms. Prachi Pallavi, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 16-12-2020 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "i) Issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order, dated 24.08.2016, passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Aurangabad Circle, Aurangabad, by which an ex parte order of assessment has been passed against the petitioner under section 31 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the assessment year 2015-16 assessing the petitioner for payment

Patna High Court CWJC No.2344 of 2017 dt.16-12-2020 2/2 of VAT of Rs. 206000.00;

ii) Quashing and setting aside the consequential demand notice, dated 24.8.2016, by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.185,000.00 upon adjusting the admitted tax already paid by the petitioner;

iii) To pass such other order(s) as your lordships may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity."

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 21.12.2020 Transmission Date