Indu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2136 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2024 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Indu Devi, W/o - Shambhu Sahni village- Rohua Virnarayan, Ps- Mushari, Dist- Muzaffarpur 2.

Shambhu Sahni, son of Ramekbal Sahni @ Rambalak Sahani village- Rohua Virnarayan, Ps- Mushari, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari Mr. Sumit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 313, 376, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being parents of Vikram. It is next submitted that father of the informant had earlier instituted Mushari P. S. Case No.81 of 2024 alleging that his daughter, i.e. informant of the present case, was kidnapped by Vikram Kumar, Vicky Kumar and Dinesh Sahani. It is submitted that police after investigation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2136 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2025 2/2 submitted final form in Mushari P. S. Case No.81 of 2024, thereafter the instant FIR came to be instituted with an allegation that informant was made to give her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. under influence of Vikram and thereafter, Vikram also got a bond executed by her and brought her home and thereafter, it is alleged that his family members were torturing her.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge POCSO Court No.03, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mushari P. S. Case No.138 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T