Samim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4310 of 2016 (3) dt.18-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4310 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2015 Thana -BRAHMPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Samim Ansari, Son of Kadir Ansari, Resident of Village- Kant, P.S.- Brahampur, District- Buxar, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Sudha Chandra For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Renu Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18.05.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned trial court has reported that trial of the petitioner has already commenced and three prosecution witnesses have already been examined.

Taking note of the aforesaid report as well as allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions trial no. 106/2015 corresponding to Brahampur P.S. case no.65/2015 pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge V, Buxar is, again, rejected.

However, the learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner as early as possible, preferably, within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4310 of 2016 (3) dt.18-05-2016 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above stated period due to fault of prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the trial court itself.

Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T