Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16417/2015bail granted

Tunni Singh @ Ratnesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-15Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16417 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -288 Year- 2013 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Tunni Singh @ Ratnesh Singh Son of Sri Bachhu Singh resident of Village- Anwa, Chackdariya, P.s- Vaishali, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.S.P.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-04-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner Tunni Singh @ Ratnesh Singh wants to renew his prayer for bail which has already been rejected by order dated 11.07.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18470 of 2014 on the ground that charges have been framed and there is no likelihood of early conclusion of the trial. Co-accused Sarvesh Kumar @ Sarvesh Kumar Singh has been allowed bail by order dated 25.03.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11649 of 2015. The learned A.P.P opposes prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering that up till now only charges have been framed and the allegation attributed against the petitioner is not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16417 of 2015 (2) dt.15-04-2015 2/2 specific. The postmortem report also does not support the allegation as made out in the FIR and co-accused Sarvesh Kumar @ Sarvesh Kumar Singh has been allowed bail and as such the petitioner is also directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Vaishali at Hajipur in Vaishali P.S. Case No. 288 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T