Sunil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1659 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2023 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sunil Singh S/o Late Ramnandan Singh @ Ramnandan Singh R/o VillageMadhurapur, Dakshin tola, ward no 23, PS- Teghra, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 385, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case as per the First Information Report is that on 05.08.2023 one Rahul Kumar, Sunil Singh(petitioner) and three other unknown persons concealing their identity had arrived at the house of the informant and there is specific allegation that all of sudden Rahul Kumar had opened fire upon the informant with the intention to commit his murder but the bullet had passed by the side of his head and he escaped.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from a bare perusal of the FIR, it would be evident that the specific allegation of firing has been alleged against one Rahul Kumar @ Karka. So far as the petitioner is concerned, there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1659 of 2025(3) dt.23-04-2025 2/2 an allegation that he demanded an amount of Rs. 20,000/- as ransom from the informant and the family members which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner is totally false allegation. As a matter of fact, a land dispute is going on between the parties, who are agnates, for the last 30 years and hence, the false implication.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances that the specific allegation of firing is not against the petitioner and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 248 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T