Patna High CourtCWJC/6803/2017dismiss for nonprosecution

Vijay Kumar And ORS v. Bihar Public Service Commission Through Its Chairman And ORS

2018-12-04Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6803 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Vijay Kumar Son of Kapildeo Bhagat Resident of Tekari Road, Choudhary Tola, Post Office - Mahendru, Police Station - Sultanganj, District - Patna.

2. Sabita Kumari Daughter of R.B. Raut Resident in the house of Sunil Kumar, Mohalla - Halai, Post Office and Police Station - Halai, District - Samastipur.

3. Dharmendra Kumar Singh Son of Lagandeo Singh Resident of S.K. Vihar Colony, Beur, Police Station - Beur, District - Patna.

4. Megha Kumari Daughter of Sunil Kumar Gupta Resident of Ward No. 10, Nirmali, Police Station - Nirmali, District - Supaul.

5. Rang Lal Gupta Son of Gulab Gupta Resident of Village - Bhaisakal, Post Office - Bhaisakal, Police Station - Ziradei, District - Siwan.

6. Pramod Kumar Pravin Son of Krishnadeo Bhagat Resident of Village - Kankar, Post Office - Bishanpur Bazar, Police Station - Kumarkhand, District - Madhepura ... Petitioners

Versus

1. Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Joint Secretary-cum-Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mrs Shilpa Singh- Ga12 & Abhanjali, Advocate for the commission : Mr.Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 04-12-2018 It is submitted by learned counsel for the Commission that the examination in question has already been conducted as such relief claimed by the petitioner for a direction for accepting his application form has become infructuous.

Since none appears for the petitioner, without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi U