Patna High CourtCWJC/17359/2008disposed

Tribeni Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-24Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17359 of 2008 ====================================================== Tribeni Sah, Son of Late Nathuni Sah, Resident of Brahampura, Soda Godown, Subodh Vastralaya Gali, Laxmi Chowk, Police Station - Brahampura, Post Office - M.I.T. Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Chief Forest Conservator, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chief Forest Conservator (Development), Bihar, Patna.

5. The Chief Forest Conservator-cum-Chief Wildlite Warden, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

7. The Director, Sanjay Gandhi Biological Park, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr.Adv. For the Respondent/s : AC to SC - 8 Mr. Mani Kant Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

24-03-2017 Sri Tej Bahadur Singh, learned senior counsel, on instruction of learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 8 as well as Sri Mani Kant Mishra, learned counsel for Accountant General, Bihar, submits that in view of facts disclosed in the counter affidavit, particularly Annexure 'A' to the counter affidavit i.e. Memo No. 555 dated 18-04-2008, grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. However, he requests for disposal of the petition with an observation to grant all consequential benefit.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17359 of 2008 (3) dt.24-03-2017 2/2 In view of submission made by learned senior counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of with an observation to grant all consequential benefit, in view of Memo No. 555 dated 18-04-2008 (Annexure 'A' to the counter affidavit). (Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U