Dheeraj Kumar @ Kaila @ Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1328 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2024 Thana- Kadirganj P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Dheeraj Kumar @ Kaila @ Niraj Kumar S/o- Bachchan Singh R/o Vill-Ohari, P.S. - Kadirganj, Dist. - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Zainul Abedin, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 354, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that informant along with his nephew were inspecting their field in the meantime a Hulla started near Shivam brick klin, accordingly, they, out of inquisitiveness, went to see what was happening and saw petitioner along with other accused persons assaulting the informant's brother Shyam Sundar Singh with an iron rod and Khanti on account of which he sustained injuries on his head and left hand, accordingly, the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1328 of 2025(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/3 and his nephew tried to save his brother when petitioner assaulted on the head of the informant on account of which he also sustained injuries. Thereafter, Prince Kumar assaulted the informant with Ramma on finger and left hand causing injury while Ranjit assaulted with iron rod and when the nephew of the informant tried to save the informant then Rahul assaulted his nephew with an iron road on account of which he sustained injury and became unconscious and the accused also damaged the vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that allegation of assault against this petitioner is general and omnibus in nature as he has been alleged that all the accused persons assaulted the brother of the informant but then submits that the date of occurrence is 27.05.2024 and the FIR came to be instituted on 01.06.2024 i.e. after a delay of more than five days of the occurrence which casts as aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that had the injured been injured on account of assault as alleged in the FIR in that event the fardbeyan of the injured would have been recorded at the hospital but then the FIR has been instituted based on the written application of the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1328 of 2025(2) dt.24-01-2025 3/3 which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 89 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T