Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15812/2015bail granted

Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-15Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15812 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -124 Year- 2013 Thana -BIKRAM District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Amit Kumar son of Giriwar Prasad Verma resident of village + P.O. Arap, p.s. Bikram, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-04-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was rejected by order dated 11.07.2014 vide Cr. Misc. No. 16254 of 2014 on the ground that during trial eight witnesses have already been examined and P.W. 8 who is the informant has stated that the deceased never complained regarding any torture or assault and she was being treated for Asthama. Similarly other witnesses have also not supported the prosecution version and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 24.06.2013 and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. after going through Annexure-5 fairly submits that now the informant is not supporting the prosecution case.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15812 of 2015 (2) dt.15-04-2015 2/2 In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Danapur, District- Patna in Sessions Trial No. 14 of 2014 arising out of Bikram P.S. Case No. 124 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T