Ajay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3484 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2014 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Ajay Yadav, Son of Naresh Yadav, Residents of Village- Sumera tola Mishra Bigha, P.S.- Makhdumpur Tehta O.P., District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 34 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, Sangeeta Devi, the daughter of the informant, was married to the petitioner just one year ago but after one month of the marriage, the petitioner and other in-laws started torturing her due to non-fulfillment of demand of gold chain and plang and ultimately, she was killed and her dead body was also made traceless.

Submission is of false implication and that against

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3484 of 2016 (4) dt.16-03-2016 2/2 the petitioner, there is no specific allegation, the petitioner without any fault, only being husband, is suffering in custody since 25.09.2015, other co-accused Naresh Yadav has been allowed bail vide Annexure-2 and, as such, the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration. Further, F.I.R. has been sent after three days in the court which creates doubt to which the learned APP seriously opposes by submitting that during investigation, the witnesses have supported the prosecution version.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner, serious in nature, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 34 of 2014 pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) ajaypd./- U T