Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5923/2026dismissed

Munna Patel @ Brijbhan Singh @ Muna Patel v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5923 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- MAIRWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Munna Patel @ Brijbhan Singh @ Muna Patel S/O Kripashankar @ Kripashankar Singh Resident Of Village- Pakari Narhiya, P.s.- Bankata, Dist.- Deoria, U.P.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Dwivedi, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Mairwa P.S.Case No. 67 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 84 and 143(2) of BNS.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 16.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.43066 of 2025 which reads as under:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mairawa P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 84 and 143(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5923 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2

3. The petitioner and others are said to have enticed away the victim for working at Mathura and thereafter they got her married to one Lavkesh. It is a case of trafficking of woman.

4. This application is dismissed in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pinki vs.

State of U.P. & Anr. reported as 2025 INSC 482 = 2025 SCC OnLine SC 781.

5. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within six months."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has been framed. It is further submits that out of 6 witnesses only 1 witness has been examined.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U T