Dilip Prasad Singh v. Lalan Paswan And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.352 of 2017 ====================================================== Dilip Prasad Singh, son of Late Dineshwar Prasad Chaudhary @ Guneshwar Singh, resident of Village Deogan Charbhara, P.S.- Bochahan, PO- Gharbhara, Munsiffi, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. Lalan Paswan

2. Badal Paswan

3. Ramesh Paswan, above are sons of Bhubneshwar Paswan, resident of Village- Deogan Tola Gharbhara, P..- Gharbhara, P.S and Anchal Bochahan, Munsiffi, District- Muzaffarpur.

4. Ratan Deep Kumar, son of Abhay Kishore Sinha,

5. Chandradeep Kumar, son of Abhay Kishore Sinha,

6. Babloo Kumar, son of Late Jogendra Prasad Sinha @ Nagendra Singh,

7. Niloo Singh, son of Late Satyandra Chaudhary @ Satyadeo Chaudhary.

8. Tinku Singh, son of Late Satyandra Chaudhary @ Satyadeo Chaudhary.

9. Sonu Singh, son of Late Satyandra Chaudhary @ Satyadeo Chaudhary,

10. Mukesh Prasad Singh, son of Late Diwakar Prasad Chaudhary,

11. Brajesh Kumar Singh, son of Late Diwakar Prasad Chaudhary,

12. Ratnesh Kumar, son of Late Sudhakar Prasad Singh,

13. Ratnakar Prasad Singh, son of Late Raghvendra Prasad Singh, all are residents of Village Beogan Tole Bharbhara, P. .- Gharbhara, P.S. and Anchal- Bochahan, Munsifi and District- Muzaffarpur.

14. Chandra Shekhar Prasad Singh, son of Late Narmdeshwar Prasad Chaudhary,

15. Rajan Prasad Singh, son of Late Narmdeshwar Prasad Chaudhary,

16. Rakesh Prasad Singh, son of Late Narmdeshwar Prasad Chaudhary,

17. Deepak Prasad Singh, son of Late Dineshwar Prasad Chaudhary,

18. Prakash Prasad Singh, son of Late Dineshwar Prasad Chaudhary, All are resident of Village- Deogan Gharbhara, P.S.- Bochahan, PO- Gharbhara, Munsifi and District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.352 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The present application has been filed against the original order passed in the suit refusing the prayer of the plaintiffpetitioner for injunction. The impugned order is appealable under the provisions of the C.P.C. Therefore, this Court holds that the present application is misconceived and is dismissed, as such. (V. Nath, J) Devendra/- U