← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5328/2026dismissed

Nageshwar Rai v. The Union Of India Through Dy. Director, D.R.I, Regional Unit

2026-04-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5328 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2024 Thana- D.R.I District- Patna ====================================================== Nageshwar Rai S/O Late Ramji Rai R/O vill - Kala Diyara, P.S - Salimpur, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The Union of India through Dy. Director, D.R.I, Regional Unit Budha Colony, Main Road, Patna- 800001 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the D.R.I.

:

Mr.Ankit Katriar, Advocate Mr.Rishi Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with D.R.I. Case No. 159/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)ii(c), 25 and 29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, approximately 30 kg of ganja was recovered from a vehicle in which the petitioner and another person were travelling.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating articles has been recovered from his possession. Learned counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 29.02.2024. The petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5328 of 2026(4) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned counsel for the D.R.I. has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and submitted that the trial is proceeding and three witnesses have been examined.

6. Considering the huge quantity of narcotics recovered, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T