← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1685/2025bail granted

Sonu Patel @ Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-28Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1685 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2024 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sonu Patel @ Sonu Kumar S/o- Ajay Patel Resident of Thumma P.s-Running saidpur District-Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dwij Raj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No. 163 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 324, 307, 379, 34 of the IPC.

3. As per allegation, the petitioner with other accused persons assaulted the informant with iron rod. They also stabbed the friend of the informant with knife. It is further alleged that all accused persons snatched Rs 15,000/- from the pocket of the informant and Rs. 5,000/- from the pocket of the friend of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1685 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. He is under custody since 17.05.2024. He has also submitted that on exactly similar footing, co-accused Anish Patel @ Anish Kumar has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 23.09.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 65670 of 2024.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No. 163 of 2024, subject to the following condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T