Tejbali Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4684 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2018 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== Tejbali Ram, aged about 35 years, male, Son of Somaru Ram, Resident of Village-Shailash, P.S.-Kichas (Parashathua), District-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan(APP 156) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the IPC.

The prosecution case, as per the written report of Jiut Ram, dated 21.10.2018, submitted to the Station House Officer, Kochas Police Station, is to the effect that on 20.10.2018, at about 11.30 A.M., the informant was sitting at his door, in the meantime, due to earlier land dispute, the petitioner and coaccused, Ten Narayan Ram came armed with an iron rod and assaulted on the nose and mouth of the wife of the informant, as a result, she received bleeding injury. It is further alleged that co-accused Somaru Ram assaulted the informant and his wife

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4684 of 2019(2) dt.29-01-2019 2/3 with lathi. Co-accused Kabutara Devi, Dhansi Kumar and Suman Kumari also assaulted and abused the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the background of earlier land dispute, the accusation has been levelled against the petitioner. The injury report suggests that the informant and his wife have received superficial simple injuries. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent. Learned APP submits that accusation against the petitioner is specific.

Considering the genesis of occurrence, being land dispute and the injuries of the informant and his wife being found superficial simple in nature, coupled with the statement made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st Class, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kochas (Parashathua) P.S. Case No. 191 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4684 of 2019(2) dt.29-01-2019 3/3 of the Cr. P.C.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U T