Gyan Chandra Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2414 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2020 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

SHYAM LAL SAH Son of Late Ramkrit Sah Resident of Village- Alampur, P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi O.P.), District- Rohtas. 2.

Vijay Sah S/o Shyam Lal Sah Resident of Village- Alampur, P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi O.P.), District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3047 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2020 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

GYAN CHANDRA SAH Son of Shyamlal Sah Resident of VillageAlampur, P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi O.P.), District- Rohtas. 2.

Kishori Sah S/o Shyam Lal Sah Resident of Village- Alampur, P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi O.P.), District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2414 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3047 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State and perused the case diary. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault upon the informant's husband as well as upon the informant by means of lathi and danda by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2414 of 2022(3) dt.25-07-2022 2/2 accused persons including the petitioners.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that from perusal of injury report of Indu Devi which is annexed with the case diary, it appears that sustained injury is simple in nature and except injury no.2 sustained by Pintu Sah, all injuries are simple in nature. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Shivsagar (Baddi) P.S. Case No. 342 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T