Chandrashekhar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1356 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-618 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== CHANDRASHEKHAR MISHRA Son of Shobhakant Mishra Resident of Village - Bel Kodha Tola, P.S. - Bairganiya, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Juhi Devi Daughter of Ghanshyam Mishra Resident of Village - Devapur, P.S. - Patahi, District - East Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2022 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No.C-618 of 2019 registered under Sections 406 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner never demanded any dowry nor subjected her (complainant) to cruelty in any manner. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail by contending that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant. The petitioner including other accused persons are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1356 of 2020(9) dt.24-01-2022 2/2 alleged to have subjected her (complainant) to cruelty and demanded additional dowry. It is also alleged that the petitioner and others have ousted the complainant from her in-laws' house. Therefore, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T