← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2038/2024disposed

Bundi Prasad Verma v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2038 of 2024 ====================================================== Bundi Prasad Verma son of Late Jobi Mahto, resident of Village-Dhandhar, P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, District-Gaya.

3.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Gaya.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Public Health and Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Wazirganj, District-Gaya. 6.

The Junior Engineer Public Health and Engineering Department, Wazirganj, District-Gaya.

7.

Shiv Shankar Prasad, Son of Late Jobi Mahto, resident of Village-Dhandhar, P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya.

8.

Jay Prakash Verma, son of Shiv Shankar Prasad, resident of VillageDhandhar, P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya. 9.

Priyatma Devi, Wife of Jay Prakash Verma, resident of Village-Dhandhar, P.S.-Wazirganj, District-Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "(a) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or writs, direction or directions commanding upon Respondent authorities specially Respondent no.3 to 6 to provide "NAL JAL" facility to petitioner at his house situated at village Dhandhar, P.S.- Wazirganj,

Patna High Court CWJC No.2038 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 District- Gaya as petitioner has not been facilitated with the benefits of "NAL JAL" Scheme due to problem created by Respondent no.7 to 9 as Respondent no.7 to 9 have not allowed the laying of water pipe through main gate."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent no.02, i.e. the District Magistrate, Gaya for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U